Angina Or Mi
angina or mi
Why not use thrombolysis in unstable angina or non-ST elevation MI, but the use in ST-segment elevation MI?
two of them are due to thrombi? Right? PLEASE DO NOT respond if you are not 100% sure
Once upon a time people were so impressed by the knowledge of Aristotle that his word was accepted in physics, just as the word of Jesus is accepted by the spiritual. These days, we really want evidence before believing in these things. The benefits are in STEMI, and less the degree of compatibility a history of the IRB. Do not work in NSTEMI. Is the "why" of it. The "Why No" "Why not work in these circumstances is a different question, and I do not know the answer, but part of it is likely that the thrombus are only part of the cascade of events. One may wonder why 90 minutes TIMI II ends are a surrogate marker People in many studies of thrombolysis, when initial studies showing the efficacy of thrombolysis has shown a difference in the time of reperfusion between streptokinase and tPA (not to mention a big cost difference), but no other difference in outcome.
Filed under: Angina Pectoris
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Leave a Reply